|
Pehaps the Prime Minister to address the long
Addressing parliament on Thursday, Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli and his team that he is not against the national government, but should be discussed openly for his country. 1 hour 52 minutes in the parliament has ever spoken to Prime Minister Oli government, spoke about various subjects. No Prime Minister had not yet addressed the House for so long.
Addressing parliament to discuss the change of government running while he was Prime Minister Oli and parliament would be dissolved parliament loyal to the rumors that said that. Prime Minister aoliko address, edited excerpt:
Many rumors also created topic. The government was asked to dissolve the Parliament. I say this government is not thinking. We are bringing down our parliamentary practice. I am not walking or turning jaskelabhitra Prime Minister. My Government has selected the majority of this Parliament is too. I abide by then Prime Minister says that until they are.
The noise came came volatility. There are many kinds of noise. The government wants to make small language information. The government has freely. So the government is simple.
I stared at a national consensus Minster no answer. Just give me your opinion.
The first and second nirvacanapascat CA constitution and the implementation of a consensus government is said to be necessary.
In this country there is no reason to remain in poverty. For the rapid development of the national consensus is essential. My party and my government I led their respective sides of the preceding national consensus was proposed.
Consent is required. I was also urged in this rostrum. Full consensus to move ahead with things as successful even though my team are my own behalf and urged open.
In those circumstances, the situation of Nepal, was isolated by earthquakes. Congress, UML, Maoist Democratic Forum is a place on the basis of consensus constitution, and the constitution to implement what has bhukampapachimako reconstruction.
All information is subject of a gentlemen's agreement has not? I and my team did not take the initiative for consensus and? He proposed to the government to avoid the others not? After the constitution that went wrong, I would like to remind consent.
Now is the democratic system. According to let the weather. Sometimes the process of democratic system does not only implement the Constitution on the basis of consensus, quake, reconstruction and economic development for all parties, the language needs to go together in the public sector.
But his is not only what should be.
Let the people the right to institutional. Correcting for drafting the constitution that it is not appropriate to proceed unforgiving step we've agreed to.
Some are out of favor. We sent people out for the purpose of drafting the constitution should not be.
Sometimes it does not accept certain things, but all had to go through samayakramale improvement.
Consent is required today. The government made no promenades, not by design that made the Senate.
It is the policy of the government of national consensus concerning the change may be. I and my team agreed to increase the country are not disruptive. We look forward to his. But the foundation of national consensus stuck with conspiracy and disloyalty. Needs to be the foundation of integrity and honesty.
My throat is dried and yielded a consensus government. We need democracy opposition. Democracy, government and opposition disagree that these two arguments? The need to be? A consensus that the democratic form of government? Executing the Constitution, the people need, consent is required for reconstruction.
Virodhaharulai consent expressed in various manogranthiharule also need to end. Advice and consent furor did not want to say that all parties with a tyanta open heart, let us discuss mananiyale. Rational basis for the solution that would benefit the country, I look forward to.
|
|